,445,291,400,400,arial,12,4,0,0,5_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
This confusion is rather embarrassing on my part, as the title and abstract of the book are pretty clear. This was not a topic I was interested in, and fully expected to struggle through the reading of the book.
Instead, I was enthralled and w This book was not at all what I expected, yet much better than I expected. Instead, I was enthralled and was happy to pick up the book at every opportunity. The main point of the book is that most of the prophecies in Revelation have been fulfilled through Nero and the Jewish war that started in his reign. His arguments are convincing, and from my perspective fairly exciting. I was never happy with the Anglo-American dispensational interpretations of Revelation — especially as they seemed to think that suffering was only significant for biblical prophecy when it would take place in the USA.
This semi-preterist view on the other hand is straight forward and makes a lot more sense historically and theologically. As a pan-millennialist, I am not yet convinced but am extremely sympathetic to what was presented, and will continue to mull over what was written.
REVELATION’S EARLY DATE (2)
Nov 03, Todd Wilhelm rated it it was amazing. Gentry makes a clear and convincing case for the book of Revelation to have been written in A. If this book would attain wide readership among average American Christians, which, unfortunately I doubt it will, it could result in a radical restructuring of the average evangelical's worldview.
In fact, I would lean toward a date afte Gentry makes a clear and convincing case for the book of Revelation to have been written in A. In fact, I would lean toward a date after the outbreak of the Neronic persecution in late A. A date in either A. My hope is that the debate will be renewed with vigor and care, for the matter is more than a merely academic or intellectual exercise; it has ramifications in the area of practical Christianity.
The resolution of the question of the dating of Revelation has far-reaching practical implications for the average Christian. As noted in our opening comments, fascination with Revelation is an extremely widespread phenomenon in American Christianity. Almost certainly this fascination will continue. The importance of Revelation for eschatological inquiry lends it an especially influential role in the development and implementation of a Christian worldview.
Hence, it is of grave ethical and cultural significance in that it impacts on the Christian's view of history. On the one hand, if Christianity's eschatological expectation is that of an imminently portending and dismally precipitous decline and extinction of Christian influence in our day, as much of current Christian literature suggests, then our Christian endeavor will be powerfully bent in one direction.
And it must necessarily be turned away from the implementation of long-term Christian cultural progress and dominion. If Revelation's judgments are yet to occur and lie in our future, then we must expect and prepare for the worst. On the other hand, if the expectation held by the Christian community is of a sure hope for progress and victory, then the focus of Christian enterprise will be of a constructive and fiture-oriented nature. Our cultural endeavor will not be in despite of our eschatology, but in light of it. We also noted in the beginning of our inquiry that a serious confusion as to the nature and message of Revelation is partly responsible for the cultural defeatism and retreatist pietism so influential in twentieth century Christianity.
There we observed that one reason for confusion as to the Church's future is due to a radical misunderstanding of the date of the writing of Revelation. If Revelation is inadvertently dated after the events it prophesies as future, the way is opened to a radical misconstruing of its message. Indeed, not only has the message been misread in such circumstances, but it has been wholly inverted, placing in our future what really lies in our past. Hence, the significance of the date of Revelation. Oct 21, Genni rated it really liked it Shelves: I will not lie. The decidedly more hopeful worldview of partial preterism is extremely appealing to me.
Growing up under my grandfather's classic dispensational preaching of the hell, fire, and brimstone variety left me with a lot of fear concerning the eschaton. However hopeful preterism is does not make it true, though. That is why I was happy to find Gentry's early date advocacy for the Revelation well-researched and well-founded.
Although preterism does not necessarily follow from establis I will not lie. Although preterism does not necessarily follow from establishment of an early date, the use of internal evidence for an early date makes a strong case for preterism in and of itself.
REVELATION’S EARLY DATE (2) | Postmillennial Worldview
Gentry presents the "self-witness" of Revelation convincingly, covering in detail almost every correlation between the prophecies and their first century fulfillment. He addresses the problems and rebuttals against the self-witness thoroughly. My only issue with this section of the book is that he completely ignores the two witnesses. I find the weakest part of the book to be the portion dealing with external evidences. For example, most late date advocates must rely almost solely on the testimony of Iraneaus to support their position.
The most Gentry can do is cast doubt on Iraneaus as a reliable source. I feel the shadow he casts with this doubt is long, though not long or dark enough to make the controversy surrounding Iraneaus conclusive either way. Ultimately, I think Gentry is successful in making a case for an early date. Opens with introduction to the study of systematic theology.
Excellent material for personal study or group Bible study. Strongly Reformed and covenantal in orientation. See more study materials at: First , when John writes Revelation, Christians are tensely mingled with the Jews. Christianity is presenting herself as the true Israel and Christians the real Jews cp.
Who but a Jew would call himself a Jew? We must remember that even Paul, the apostle to the Gentiles, took Jewish vows and had Timothy circumcised. But after the destruction of the Temple A. In fact, the famed Jewish rabbi, Gamaliel II, put a curse on Christians in the daily benediction, which virtually forbad social inter-mingling. This would suggest a date prior to the final separation of Judaism and Christianity.
The legal separation of Christianity from Judaism was in its earliest stages, beginning with the Neronic persecution in late A. Interestingly, in the A. Second , at the time John writes, things are in the initial stages of a fundamental change. John points to the approaching humiliation of the Jews, noting that God will vindicate his Church against them. This can have reference to nothing other than the destruction of Israel and the Temple, which was prophesied by Christ.
See a Problem?
There are scores of such references in such writers as Melito, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Lactantius, and others. There are other arguments regarding the Jewish character of Revelation, such as its grammar, its reference to the twelve tribes, allusions to the priestly system, temple worship, and so forth. The point seems clear enough: When John writes Revelation, Christianity is not divorced from Israel. This is strong socio-cultural evidence for a pre-A. Righteous Writing Correspondence Course This course covers principles for reading a book, using the library, determining a topie, formulating a thesis, outline, researching, library use, writing clearly and effectively, getting published, marketing, and more!
Is not Jerusalem itself surrounded by its own set of 7 hills? There were 7 members in the immediate family of this House of Annas who monopolized the high priesthood by their wealth and ability to pander to Roman authorities — Annas Ananus , his 5 sons Eleazar, Jonathan, Theophilus, Matthias, and Ananus , and his son-in-law Joseph Caiaphas. I believe at least one of them, Jonathan, was murdered by the Sicarii by then.
- b2fair matchmaking event.
- REVELATION’S EARLY DATE (1).
- relative age dating practice worksheet?
- .
- Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation.
- .
This was when James the Just was martyred at the instigation of Ananus the son, who was then deposed for overstepping the bounds of his delineated powers. This still preserves the early-date internal proof for Revelation — it only bumps it earlier in time by a couple of years. It is a thinly-veiled comparison to the avaricious House of Annas.
This is 7 men total. Christ was at war Rev. If there are any holes in this hypothesis, I would appreciate them being pointed out so that I can scrap this theory if need be. And writing a reasonable comment. Thus, while John wrote, the Temple was still standing, awaiting its approaching doom. The reference to the Temple is hard architectural evidence that gets us back into an era pre-A. He did so in a vision, in this book of visions. Much like he entered heaven Rev 4: This is a good article.
One thing we must keep in mind is that Revelation is apocalyptic. I have been late date most of my life. In recent years, I am leaning to an earlier date. The Temple is still there to be measured and Nero is the I am not a full preterist by any means, but there is much in Revelation which was accomplished in the first century. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account.
Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam.
Learn how your comment data is processed. Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. AND to receive free occasional pdf study papers. If you sign up for AmazonSmile on Amazon. This does not add to your own purchase price, but it does support my research and writing ministry.